The First Cause

It seems to me that Atheism as a belief system is equivalent to various questionable belief systems in that it is fashionable to many who see many others in intellectual and power circles believing in it. Yet, like the others, when examined more closely it just fails to hold up to the prevailing evidence. For argument’s sake here are a few articles to.just show this is at the very least a very debatable idea. 

Starting from a presumption, just to stretch the mind say, that Atheism isn’t valid or at least is only a spurious dominant or superior viewpoint, then what is the most likely alternative? That would seem to be a ‘Mind cause’ which can be referred to as Source, Universal Intelligence, Creator, Cosmic Mind, God, or whatever term each individual feels most comfortable with. 

One idea among theologians that I really like is that “God is that which nothing greater can be thought.” For if there is something that is greater than a conceived God/Mind/Creator then the greater conception would be the superior thing and that which is more probable.

That which is infinite is greater than that which is finite. Therefore an infinite Mind cause is more probable than a finite God or Mind cause / Creator. What could that kind of Mind-Cause be like? There is no known or universally agreed upon description of it. Well, other infinite ’things’ that come to mind are types of energy – the electromagnetic spectrum for example. So a Creator consisting of infinite energy, with an infinite capacity to manifest limiting fields of control or restriction of its nature while maintaining qualities of infinite consciousness or omniscience, omnipotence, and omnipresence would be a reasonable possibility. 

In this conception that which we would call ’Soul’ would be a portion of this spectrum. A Life Force may also be part of this spectrum. Then rather than discrete, independent souls there would instead be something like souls being somewhat like distinct wave patterns imprinted upon an infinite soul force in a like manner of radio or television broadcasts imprinted upon their carrier waves. 

From the human mind perspective with its limited senses this could all appear as a purely material reality composed of discrete jumbles of reactive chemical elements and imagined them being possibly infused with independent and discrete soul segments that can survive the physical breakdown of the material bonds they are temporarily associated with. 

Maybe something worth pondering. Some may want to think further on any implications. Such thought cannot hurt as stretching the mind would intuitively seem to be a universal good in itself.

3 thoughts on “The First Cause

  1. Unknown's avatar Anonymous

    We could dig deeper into the act of thought itself. . . so what if an atheist meditates and experiences oneness, and experiences themself as a co-creator of reality, would that make them give up atheism to to realize they have divine creative abilities? Can an atheist meditate and keep their atheism intact?

    Like

  2. Unknown's avatar Anonymous

    There’s a paragraph I’d like you to clarify please: “From the human mind perspective with its limited senses this could all appear as a purely material reality composed of discrete jumbles of reactive chemical elements and imagined them being possibly infused with independent and discrete soul segments that can survive the physical breakdown of the material bonds they are temporarily associated with. ” and imagined them? who imagined the, the human mind or the infinite god?

    Like

    1. Unknown's avatar Anonymous

      I was referring to one’s perspective from what they think is their own independent mind and consciousness which is the standard understanding. So each person generally believes they have their own independent mind. If someone conceives the existenc of an infinite god then it is that conception occurs in the imgination of the person. The conception or imagination of this does not mean necessarily that there actually exists an ‘infinite god’ but that can be a logical conclusion from a person’s reasoning.

      Like

Leave a reply to Anonymous Cancel reply